Cases 41 - 50 of 5,212
In Re: Meta Platforms, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024mc00182
Petitioner:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, Inc., WhatsApp LLC and others
Respondent:
Leonid Sigal
In Re: Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mc00183
Petitioner:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, Inc., WhatsApp LLC and others
Respondent:
Michael J. Black
FW Deep Value Opportunities Fund I, LLC v. The Carlyle Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00430
Petitioner:
FW Deep Value Opportunities Fund I, LLC
Respondent:
The Carlyle Group, Inc., Carlyle Group Management L.L.C. and Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Murphy v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael P. Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
Garcia v. Simo et al
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia derivatively on behalf of MAPLEBEAR INC. d/b/a Instacart
Defendant:
Fidji Simo, Nick Giovanni, Alan Ramsay and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Scarborough v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Davant Scarborough
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., John Stankey and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
The Weatherby Group LLC v. TriStar Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
The Weatherby Group LLC
Defendant:
TriStar Manufacturing, Inc. and Kyle Elliot
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Zhang et al
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd.
Defendant:
Liang Zhang, Sinolam Consulting & Trading Holdings Pte. Ltd., Notarc Port Investment LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Scott v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Finger v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
