Cases 11 - 20 of 1,400
Rose Mary Vazquez v. Belz Investment Company, L.P., et al
as 24-5130
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARY VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
BELZ INVESTMENT COMPANY, L.P. and PEABODY PLACE L.P.
John Doe v. Brian Spencer, et al
as 24-5251
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
BRIAN SPENCER and FICTITIOUS PERSONS 1-10
Jason Cunningham v. Shelby County, TN, et al
as 24-5241
Plaintiff:
JASON CUNNINGHAM, individually and as adult natural son and sole wrongful death beneficiary and next of kin, affiant and administrator ad litem and personal representative for Nancy Jane Lewellyn, Deceased, and Estate of Nancy Jane Lewellyn
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN, SHERIFF WILLIAM OLDHAM, ROBERT PASCHAL, individually and in his official capacity as a Shelby County Sheriff's Deputy and others
Gregory Cassels, et al v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc., et al
as 24-3106
Plaintiff:
GREGORY P. CASSELS and OLGA CASSELS
Defendant:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, RODNEY KARL and others
Ronald Emrit v. Progressive Insurance Co., et al
as 24-3217
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO. and STEPHANIE COURTNEY, p/k/a "Flo" from Progressive Insurance Co.
Timothy Davis v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 24-5210
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EUGENE ELVIS DAVIS
Defendant:
SIG SAUER, INC.
Farm Bureau General Insurance Company of Michigan v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc., et al
as 24-3107
Plaintiff:
FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN
Defendant:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., RODNEY KARL and GLEN KOONS
Timothy Davis v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 24-5103
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EUGENE ELVIS DAVIS
Defendant:
SIG SAUER, INC.
Emma Coleman v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
as 23-6044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMA COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, dba Wal-Mart No. 2548, STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and C & C DOORS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
