Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 142
Eric Stenson v. Radiology Limited PLC
as 22-16571
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. ERIC JAMES STENSON
Defendant / Appellee: RADIOLOGY LIMITED PLC
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Barry Donnellan v. Goethe, LLC
as 22-35948
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: GOETHE, LLC
Barry Donnellan v. Flowline Alaska, Inc.
as 22-35952
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: FLOWLINE ALASKA, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Brice, Inc.
as 22-35951
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: BRICE, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Fountainhead Development, Inc.
as 22-35956
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Sourdough Express, Inc.
as 22-35957
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: SOURDOUGH EXPRESS, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Gene's, Inc.
as 22-35954
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: GENE'S, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.
as 22-35950
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA RIVERWAYS, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Pike's on the River, Inc.
as 22-35949
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: PIKE'S ON THE RIVER, INC.
Barry Donnellan v. Great Northwest, Inc.
as 22-35958
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BARRY DONNELLAN, Ex. Rel and Qui tam
Defendant / Appellee: GREAT NORTHWEST, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?