Property Damage Product Liability Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56666
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: KIMBERLY SMITH and CHRISTINE KNOTT
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56436
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56364
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: W. ALLEN MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Starr Indemnity & Liability Co, et al v. Rolls-Royce Corporation
as 16-16629
Plaintiff - Appellant: STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY, as Subrogee of Med-Trans Corporation and MED-TRANS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Movant: CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Proposed Intervenor
City of Pomona v. SQM North America Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-56062
Plaintiff - Appellant: CITY OF POMONA
Defendant - Appellee: SQM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Amicus Curiae: STEPHEN A. SALTZBURG, MICHAEL M. MARTIN, and JOELLE ANNE MORENO, Law Professors
Amicus Curiae - Pending: DAVID LAURENCE FAIGMAN I, Professor
Steven Gavic, et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 14-56583
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVEN GAVIC, SHANNON CARTY, MICHELLE MCGOWAN and others
Objector - Appellant: KRISTINA K. NEWMAN and JOYCE MILLER
Defendant - Appellee: ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Steven Gavic, et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 14-56532
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVEN GAVIC, SHANNON CARTY, MICHELLE MCGOWAN and others
Objector - Appellant: PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee: ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Edge Lofts Master Condominium, et al v. Victaulic Company, et al
as 14-35642
Plaintiff - Appellee: EDGE LOFTS MASTER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, an Oregon non-profit corporation and EDGE LOFTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, an Oregon non-profit corporation
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant: VICTAULIC COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation
Third-party-defendant - Appellee: SEAL DYNAMICS, a Florida corporation and F&S DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Edge Lofts Master Condominium, et al v. Victaulic Company
as 14-35620
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDGE LOFTS MASTER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, an Oregon non-profit corporation and EDGE LOFTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, an Oregon non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellee: VICTAULIC COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation
Tucson Electric Power Company v. Pauwels Canada Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-15710
Plaintiff - Appellee: TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, an Arizona corporation
Defendant - Appellant: PAUWELS CANADA INCORPORATED, a Canadian corporation, DBA CG Power Systems Canada Incorporated

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?