Cases 91 - 100 of 97,417
Cruz v. Oliver, et al.
as 24-3013
Petitioner:
CARIM CRUZ
Respondent:
RONALD OLIVER, Substituted in Place of William Hutching per [40] Order., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, Substituted by Ronald Oliver per [40] Order.
Taylor v. County of Washington, et al.
as 24-2998
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Sheriff LOPEZ, ALLISON BROWN and others
Taylor v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-3003
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON and ROBERT D. JONES, (34176)
Taylor v. Biden, et al.
as 24-3012
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, DEMOCRATIC PARTY and OREGON DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Taylor v. Independent Firm of Consulting Engineers and Technicians, et al.
as 24-3018
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT FIRM OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND TECHNICIANS, E.O.C.I. and ZULETA, Chaplain
Rajabian, et al. v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al.
as 24-3000
Plaintiff:
ZAKIA JACKLINE RAJABIAN and DULCERIA LA BONITA WHOLESALE LLC, an Arizona corporation
Defendant:
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, PHOENIX MOTOR COMPANY INCORPORATED, an Arizona Corporation doing business as Mercedes-Benz of Scottsdale, VERN FOUTZ and others
Medrano Robayo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2993
Petitioner:
JOHN HERMES MEDRANO ROBAYO, YUDY CAROLINA HERNANDEZ PARRA, DAN JEREMY MEDRANO HERNANDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Herrera Padron v. Garland
as 24-2991
Petitioner:
ABIGAIL MARGARITA HERRERA PADRON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zeynalyan, et al. v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 24-3001
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ZEYNALYAN and NORA SARGSYAN
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
as 24-3005
Plaintiff:
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
