Cases 91 - 100 of 2,265
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Big Smoke Cigar Club LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Big Smoke Cigar Club LLC doing business as Big Smoke Cigar Club and Berry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ruskiewicz v. Oklahoma City University
as 5:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Maria Ruskiewicz
Defendant:
Oklahoma City University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Castro v. Ziriax et al
as 5:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Paul Ziriax and Donald John Trump
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Republican Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Sunset Patio Bar LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Sunset Patio Bar LLC doing business as Sunset Patio Bar and Shyon Keoppel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis et al v. Ponca Organic LLC
as 5:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Lauren Davis
Defendant:
Ponca Organic LLC doing business as Stillwater Dispensary
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
