Cases 121 - 130 of 826
Norwood v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Chester Norwood
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Roseberry v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Scott Roseberry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Losee v. Kijakazi et al
as 2:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Jason T Losee
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Spaulding v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Staci Spaulding
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maizler v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Hannah Maizler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
McBeth v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Sarah J. McBeth
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Vargas v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Lorin Vargas
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hakala v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Shane Channing Hakala
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Schneider v. Kijakazi et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
James B Schneider
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Shelton v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shelton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
