Cases 141 - 150 of 213
SUMTER v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2009cv01980
Plaintiff:
LAKERRA SUMTER
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01905
Plaintiff:
PHOEBE R. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
ACKERMAN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01749
Plaintiff:
PETER ACKERMAN and MRS. PETER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BENTLEY
as 1:2009cv01734
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EUGENE M. BENTLEY, III
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Peter Ackerman, et al v. USA
as 09-5317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter Ackerman and Joanne Leedom-Ackerman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
LUNDBERG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01466
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOEL JONATHAN LUNDBERG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED AMERICAN HOUSING & EDUCATION FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01340
Plaintiff:
UNITED AMERICAN HOUSING & EDUCATION FOUNDATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7428 IRS: Declaratory Judgment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ACKERMAN
as 1:2009cv01172
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PETER ACKERMAN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MORTEN
as 1:2009cv01018
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARLENE MORTEN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
BENNETT-BEY v. SHULMAN
as 1:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
FLOYD BENNETT-BEY
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
