Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 97,485
Robian v. Garland
as 24-3140
Petitioner: WADAD SAYON ROBIAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morales-Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-3156
Petitioner: HECTOR MORALES-GONZALEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
McKinley v. Garrett
as 24-3144
Petitioner: GARY MCKINLEY
Respondent: TIM GARRETT
Alfaro Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3130
Petitioner: MARIA SUYAPA ALFARO CRUZ, ANDRES DAVID PALMA ALFARO and ANDREA ELIZABETH PALMA ALFARO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sharif v. Swindling, et al.
as 24-3153
Plaintiff: MUHSIN SHARIF
Defendant: ALEX SWINDLING, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-3, Police Officers with the Eugene Police Department, ALEC SWINDLING and others
Barrios-Escobar v. Garland
as 24-3138
Petitioner: EDGAR BARRIOS-ESCOBAR
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Carrillo
as 24-3157
Defendant: ROBERT CARRILLO and Robert Carillo
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hall v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-3100
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, GO2BANK, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Odquina v. City and County of Honolulu, et al.
as 24-3105
Plaintiff: EDWARD ODQUINA
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU and ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Khatibi, et al. v. Hawkins, et al.
as 24-3108
Plaintiff: AZADEH KHATIBI, M.D., an individual, MARILYN SINGLETON, M.D., an individual and DO NO HARM, a Virginia nonprofit corporation
Defendant: RANDY HAWKINS, in his official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, LAURIE ROSE LUBIANO, in her official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board of California, REJI VARGHESE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?