Cases 41 - 50 of 35,110
IN RE MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA
as 1:2024mc00048
Not Yet Classified:
MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA
Petitioner:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Respondent:
TARGETSMART COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Essential Minerals Association v. EPA, et al
as 24-1091
Petitioner:
Essential Minerals Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
BEIKZADEH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
HOSSEIN BEIKZADEH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. CONSULATE GENERAL TORONTO, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Matthew Logan v. SEC
as 24-1095
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Logan
Respondent:
Securities and Exchange Commission
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BAILEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Pamela BAILEY d/b/a More Than Our Crimes
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. U.S. AIR FORCE
as 1:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA
Defendant:
U.S. AIR FORCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
