Cases 41 - 50 of 16,692
Doe v. Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement, and Legal Services Funds et al v. Zero Below Trucking Corp et al
as 7:2024cv02828
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement, and Legal Services Funds by Louis A. Picani, Joseph Sansone, Dominick Cassanelli, Jr., Roger Taranto and Westchester Teamsters Local Union No. 456
Defendant:
Zero Below Trucking Corp and R. Andrew Hunter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions
Gesualdi et al v. Richmond Ready Mix et al
as 1:2024cv02788
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gesualdi, Louis Bisignano, Darin Jeffers and others
Defendant:
Richmond Ready Mix and Richmond Ready Mix II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Lorusso et al v. Northwell Health Pension Plan et al
as 2:2024cv02785
Plaintiff:
William Lorusso, Margaret Gurlides, Linda Moriarty and others
Defendant:
Northwell Health Pension Plan, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Abbey v. United Healthcare Insurance Company of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Diane Abbey
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company of New York and United HealthCare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gaydos v. I.A.M.A.W District No. 15 Health Fund et al
as 2:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Robert M Gaydos and Robert M. Gaydos
Defendant:
I.A.M.A.W District No. 15 Health Fund, George T Pryor, Robert P Liehmann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Milcon Construction Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01253
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Defendant:
Milcon Construction Corporation, 20 Contracting Corp Inc. and ION Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Marble Industry Pension Fund et al v. Platinum Maintenance Services Corp.
as 1:2024cv02756
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Marble Industry Pension Fund, Trustees of the Marble Industry Annuity Fund, Trustees of the Marble Industry Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Platinum Maintenance Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Teamsters 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement and Legal Services Funds, by Louis A. Picani, Joseph Sansone, Dominick Cassanelli, Jr., Roger Taranto, Ross et al v. K&D Aggregates Inc et al
as 7:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Teamsters 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement and Legal Services Funds, by Louis A. Picani, Joseph Sansone, Dominick Cassanelli, Jr., Roger Taranto, Ross and Westchester Teamsters Local Union No. 456
Defendant:
K&D Aggregates Inc and Darrell Bjorkland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions
Tully v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball et al
as 1:2024cv02764
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tully
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner of Baseball d/b/a Major League Baseball, Major League Baseball Pension Committee and Major League Baseball Supplemental Pension Plan for Office Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
