Cases 61 - 70 of 870
Fish Northwest v. Scott Rumsey, et al
as 22-35641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FISH NORTHWEST, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT RUMSEY, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for NOAA Fisheries' West Coast Region, CHRIS OLIVER, in his official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE and KELLY SUSEWIND, in his official capacity as Director of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Desert Survivors, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 22-16044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DESERT SURVIVORS, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Defendant:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35583
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CONSERVATION NORTHWEST, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MARTHA WILLIAMS, Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, by and through the Office of Species Conservation and the Idaho Fish and Game Commission
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35532
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C.
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35533
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C. and others
Friends of the Crazy Mountains, et al v. Mary Erickson, et al
as 22-35555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE CRAZY MOUNTAINS, a public land organization, MONTANA CHAPTER BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS, a non-profit organization, ENHANCING MONTANA'S WILDLIFE AND HABITAT, a public outreach organization and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY ERICKSON, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Custer Gallatin National Forest, LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, Region One, for the U.S. Forest Service, VICKI CHRISTIANSEN, in her official capacity as chief of the U.S. Forest Service and others
Christian Komor v. USA, et al
as 22-15851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOCTOR CHRISTIAN R. KOMOR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, STEFFANIE FELDMAN, Office of the President and others
Yurok Tribe, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
as 22-15818
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YUROK TRIBE, on its own behalf and on behalf of its members and FRANKIE MYERS, Yurok Tribal Council Vice Chairperson, in his official and individual capacities
Intervenor:
KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Paul Donohoe, et al v. USFS, et al
as 22-35380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DONOHOE, CATHY DONOHOE, TORIAN DONOHOE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, MARY ERICKSON, Forest Supervisor and KEN COFFIN, District Ranger
Native Ecosystems Council, et al v. Keith Lannom, et al
as 22-35496
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL and ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant:
KEITH LANNOM, U.S. Forest Service Deputy Regional Forester and U.S. FOREST SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
