Cases 71 - 80 of 217
Deyoe Harris v. University of AZ Police Dept., et al
as 16-16570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEYOE R. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA POLICE DEPARTMENT, UofAPD, TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, TPD, TUCSON FIRE DEPARTMENT, TFD and others
Katinka Hosszu v. Casey Barrett, et al
as 16-16571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATINKA HOSSZU
Defendant - Appellee:
CASEY BARRETT, an individual, SPORTS PUBLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., DBA Swimming World Magazine, DBA SwimmingWorldMagazine.com and DOES, 1 through 20, inclusive
Karen Arveson v. Montana DHHS, et al
as 16-35618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN ARVESON
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTANA DHHS, ANN SHEEHY YEGEN and GLENDIVE CPS
Barbara Brown v. Daven Wellman, et al
as 16-56096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA E. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVEN T. WELLMAN and DOES, 1 through 6
Terry Digiovanni v. Federal Hierarchy, et al
as 15-56278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY DIGIOVANNI
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL HIERARCHY, BARACK OBAMA, CHUCK HAGEL and others
Future Ads LLC v. Jonathan Gillman, et al
as 14-55048
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FUTURE ADS LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN L. GILLMAN, an individual and OMNIANGLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al v. Crystal Cox
as 14-35744
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK
Defendant / Appellant:
CRYSTAL COX
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al v. Crystal Cox
as 14-35731
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK
Defendant / Appellant:
CRYSTAL COX
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, et al v. Crystal Cox
as 14-35730
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK
Defendant / Appellant:
CRYSTAL COX
April Ademiluyi v. David Phillip
as 14-16765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APRIL ADEMILUYI
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LEE PHILLIPS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
