Cases 71 - 80 of 96
Richard Sharrock, et al v. USA
as 10-16425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. SHARROCK and CHRISTINA M. SHARROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bessie Waltz v. USA, et al
as 10-15713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BESSIE IRENE WALTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY and RICHARD ERNEST BAILEY
Pamela Earls v. Joseph Welsh
as 09-17913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA EARLS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH WELSH, Lt. US Navy
Chester Montgomery v. American Family Mutual Insuran
as 09-17650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER MONTGOMERY
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Aaron Schoenfeld v. USA
as 09-56822
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AARON SCHOENFELD
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kristen Burnham v. USA, et al
as 09-16581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTEN BURNHAM, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Caroline Burnham and as Representative of Ethan J. Mayne, a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RICHARD ALAN YOUNG
Anthony Aberdeen v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., et al
as 09-56149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY Z. ABERDEEN, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Amanda Ramos-Santoya v. The Insurance Company of the S, et al
as 09-16220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMANDA MARIE RAMOS-SANTOYA
Defendant - Appellee:
THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Dawn Matlock v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al
as 09-15972
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAWN MATLOCK
Defendant - Appellant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Defendant:
GREYHOUND, INC.
Larry Lizotte v. Praxair Inc.
as 09-35332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY A. LIZOTTE, a single person
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAXAIR INC., a Washington corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
