Cases 71 - 80 of 11,498
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00579
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OSAGE NATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
OSAGE NATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Yanping Chen v. FBI, et al
as 24-5050
Plaintiff:
Yanping Chen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Defense and others
Appellant:
Catherine Herridge
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR FOUR ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY SNAP INC.
as 1:2024ml00585
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR FOUR ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY SNAP INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. RESTORO CYPRUS LIMITED et al
as 1:2024cv00735
Defendant:
RESTORO CYPRUS LIMITED, REIMAGE CYPRUS LIMITED, RESTORO LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
35 STATE STREET HOTEL PARTNERS, LLC v. U.S. ATTORNEY DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
35 STATE STREET HOTEL PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ZHOU v. DEFORD
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
HUIXUAN ZHOU
Defendant:
JOSHUA P. DEFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PETWAY v. TRANSUNION
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
JACQULINE PETWAY
Defendant:
TRANSUNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
