Cases 81 - 90 of 213
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GULLETT
as 1:2015cv00652
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GULLETT - EL : TAQUAN-RASHE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
JUSTICE v. KOSKINEN et al
as 1:2015cv00622
Plaintiff:
ROBERT V. JUSTICE
Defendant:
JOHN A. KOSKINEN and JEFFREY BEARD
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
ONEWEST BANK, N.A. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00513
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , IDA N. JOHNSON, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS and others
Plaintiff:
ONEWEST BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MADE IN THE USA FOUNDATION, INC. v. KOSKINEN
as 1:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
MADE IN THE USA FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN A. KOSKINEN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7428 IRS: Declaratory Judgment
Thomas Smith v. USA
as 14-5253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Edward Smith, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01620
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALEXANDER DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US ATTORNEY and THREE UNKNOWN AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STARR INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2014cv01593
Plaintiff:
STARR INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
SIMEONE & MILLER, LLP et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01421
Plaintiff:
SIMEONE & MILLER, LLP and DEBORAH GOLANSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF MARYLAND, KEY HEALTH MEDICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
TERRY v. FIRST MERIT NATIONAL BANK
as 1:2014cv01197
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. TERRY
Defendant:
FIRST MERIT NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
TERRY v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
LUE CINDY TERRY
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEWINE, KIMBERLY COCROFT, ZACH SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
