Cases 81 - 90 of 227
Mary Orsi v. Ethicon LLC
as 15-56253
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY ORSI
Defendant / Appellant:
ETHICON LLC, a Limited Liability Company
Florence Buchanan v. Ethicon LLC
as 15-56255
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FLORENCE BUCHANAN
Defendant / Appellant:
ETHICON LLC
Vickie Skelton v. Ethicon LLC
as 15-56254
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICKIE SKELTON
Defendant / Appellant:
ETHICON LLC, a Limited Liability Company
Sara Carmona v. Ethicon LLC
as 15-56256
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SARA CARMONA
Defendant / Appellant:
ETHICON LLC, a Limited Liability Company
Xochilt Robinson v. Ethicon LLC
as 15-56252
Plaintiff / Appellee:
XOCHILT ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellant:
ETHICON LLC, a Limited Liability Company
Lindsay Cooper, et al v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.
as 15-56424
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINDSAY R. COOPER, JAMES R. SUTTON, KIM GIESEKING and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., AKA TEPCO
Real Party In Interest:
SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
WILLIAM J. FALLON, Admiral, THOMAS B. FARGO, Admiral, GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN and others
Aline Miller v. Ford Motor Co.
as 14-36001
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALINE L. MILLER, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
OREGON ASSOCIATION OF DEFENSE COUNSEL and PRODUCT LIABILITY ADVISORY COUNCIL
Michel Hendrix v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
as 14-56538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHEL HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Ronald Arnold v. Sam's Club
as 14-35626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD S. ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM'S CLUB, Store #6603
Stephen Wendell, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al
as 14-16321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN WENDELL and LISA WENDELL, for themselves and as successors-in-interest to Maxx Wendell, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
