Cases 111 - 120 of 599
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Trendtex Fabrics, Ltd. v NTKN, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Trendtex Fabrics, Ltd.
Defendant:
NTKN, Inc., Hung Ky, Shaka Time, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe Subscriber
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
