Cases 101 - 110 of 266
Watts v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Danny Watts
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Starbucks Coffee Company Store #11259 and Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Riley
as 1:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Donna J. Taylor
Defendant:
Richard A. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe XX et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
John Doe XX , John Doe XXI , John Doe XXII and others
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America , Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Hornaday
as 1:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Calysta Sharp and A. H.
Defendant:
Eric Hornaday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Payne v. Norco, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00420
Plaintiff:
Danny Payne
Defendant:
Norco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruchert et al v. Nez Perce Tribe et al
as 3:2016cv00413
Defendant:
Nez Perce Tribe , John Pete Williamson , Jane Doe Williamson and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ruchert and Cheryl Ruchert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kemper et al v. High Range Aviation, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kemper and Joyce Kemper
Defendant:
High Range Aviation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horvath v. The City of Ponderay, Idaho et al
as 2:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
Chrystle Lynda Leah Horvath
Defendant:
The City of Ponderay, Idaho and Michael Hutter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galusha et al v. Rogers et al
as 2:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
Judi Galusha and Reginald Galusha
Defendant:
James Rogers and Jessica Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Idaho Legislative Representatives et al
as 1:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones, Robert Coy, Richard J Drennon and others
Defendant:
Idaho Legislative Representatives, State of Idaho, Idaho Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
