Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Trace Produce, LLC v. Dole Food Company Inc
as 1:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
Trace Produce, LLC
Defendant:
Dole Food Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eye Safety Systems, Inc. v. Revision Military LTD
as 1:2011cv00636
Plaintiff:
Eye Safety Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Revision Military LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hillco Technologies, Inc. v TFC Internatinal, LLC
as 3:2011cv00546
Plaintiff:
Hillco Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
TFC International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bow Jax, Inc. v. Cabelas, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00627
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson, Inc. and Sims Vibration Laboratory, Inc
Plaintiff:
Bow Jax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bow Jax, Inc. v. Cabelas, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00627
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson, Inc. and Sims Vibration Laboratory, Inc
Plaintiff:
Bow Jax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rekluse Motor Sports, Inc., an ID corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Plaintiff:
Rekluse Motor Sports, Inc., an ID corporation and Drussel Wilfley Design, LLC, a CO corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Rekluse Motor Sports, Inc., an ID corporation v. Drussel Wilfley Design, LLC, a CO corporation
as 1:2010cv00537
Defendant:
Drussel Wilfley Design, LLC, a CO corporation
Plaintiff:
Rekluse Motor Sports, Inc., an ID corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Clip Ventures LLC v. U-Dig-It Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00529
Plaintiff:
Clip Ventures LLC
Defendant:
U-Dig-It Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hakes et al v. RJB Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hakes and Mark L. Anderson
Defendant:
RJB Company, Inc., Ronald J. Boudreau, Judy Boudreau and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PakSense, Inc. v. QA Supplies, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
PakSense, Inc
Defendant:
QA Supplies, LLC and Tempsen Electronic Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
