Tenth Circuit Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,756
Caro Land Co. II, LLC v. Pleasant View City Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Caro Land Co. II, LLC
Defendant:
Pleasant View City Corp. and Brandon Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caro Land Co. II, LLC v. Pleasant View City Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Caro Land Co. II, LLC
Defendant:
Pleasant View City Corp. and Brandon Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Other Property Damage
LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. United States of America by and through the Department of Justice
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
LSF9 Master Participation Trust
Defendant:
United States of America by and through the Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Locke Supply Company et al v. Oklahoma City City of
as 5:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Locke Supply Company
Intervenor:
Oklahoma City Commercial Developers Association
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seehase (PS) et al v. Teske et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Diana Seehase and Dawn Watkins
Defendant:
Andrew H. Teske, John Pryzoda, Mark J. Jachimiak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Peak Property Rentals v. Gibbons et al
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Peak Property Rentals
Defendant:
Tracy Gibbons and Royce Monson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Southwest Lending LLC v. LAT33 Capital, INC, et al
as 1:2024cv00353
Defendant:
LAT33 Capital, INC, LMH Financial Corporation, Western Spotted, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Southwest Lending LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP v. Isaac et al
as 5:2024cv00380
Defendant:
Phillips Gas Company, Harold Isaac, Karen Isaac and others
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
