Wyoming Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 155
Frank v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gary Frank
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bezanson et al
as 2:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Donae Bezanson and Mary Murray
Cross_claimant:
Donae Bezanson and Mary Murray
Cross_defendant:
Mary Murray and Donae Bezanson
Counter_claimant:
Mary Murray
Counter_defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Smith v. Scientific Drilling International Inc
as 2:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Gurney D Smith
Defendant:
Scientific Drilling International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Floyd v. FMC Corporation
as 2:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
Jane M Floyd
Defendant:
FMC Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cline v. Teton County Hospital District
as 2:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
Shannan Cline
Defendant:
Teton County Hospital District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wells et al v. Sunbelt Rentals Inc
as 2:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Tim Wells , Neal Teeples and Gerald Auvil
Defendant:
Sunbelt Rentals Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Wells et al v. Walgreens
as 2:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tim Wells , Neal Teeples and Gerald Auvil
Defendant:
Walgreens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Wells et al v. Ramax LLC
as 2:2013cv00213
Plaintiff:
Tim Wells , Neal Teeples and Gerald Auvil
Defendant:
Ramax LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Wells et al v. Edward Kramer & Sons
as 2:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
Tim Wells , Neal Teeples and Gerald Auvil
Defendant:
Edward Kramer & Sons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Wells et al v. Architectural Specialties Inc
as 2:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Tim Wells , Neal Teeples and Gerald Auvil
Defendant:
Architectural Specialties LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
