Eleventh Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 413,737
Williams v. T-S Manufacturing Co et al
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Williams
Defendant:
T-S Manufacturing Co, Automation & Electronics (USA) Limited, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Chappell v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Harold Chappell
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelly v. Philip Morris International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60437
Plaintiff:
Zachary Kelly
Defendant:
Philip Morris International, Inc. and Swedish Match North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henry v. WALMART, INC
as 9:2024cv80330
Plaintiff:
Nelson Henry
Defendant:
WALMART, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Nelson Henry v. Walmart Inc.
as 9:2024cv80331
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and NELSON HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Witt v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Leonard Witt
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis et al v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80304
Plaintiff:
Seth Lewis and Ashley Lewis
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quigley et al v. Future Motion Inc.
as 0:2024cv60415
Plaintiff:
Daniella Quigley and Joshua Denning
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hester et al v. Future Motion Inc.
as 0:2024cv60413
Plaintiff:
Paul Hester and Kelley Hester
Defendant:
Future Motion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chester v. Future Motion, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60410
Plaintiff:
Donald Chester
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc., Crown Pawn LLC and Crowned King, Inc. d/b/a Crown Pawn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
