US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,615
Herring v. Collection Associates Ltd et al
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Susan Herring
Defendant:
Collection Associates Ltd and AvanteUSA Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hatton v. Southwest Recovery Services LLC
as 5:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hatton
Defendant:
Southwest Recovery Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
S.G. v. McGinnis
as 5:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
S.G.
Defendant:
Michael Lee McGinnis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Langer v. Premier Recovery Solutions LLC
as 4:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Charles Langer
Defendant:
Premier Recovery Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McKnight v. CRST Lincoln Sales Inc
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McKnight
Defendant:
CRST Lincoln Sales Inc doing business as CRST The Transportation Solution Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Giles v. Spring Oaks Capital LLC
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Krashunda Giles
Defendant:
Spring Oaks Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vestal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
James Vestal
Defendant:
MD Karen Ballard Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 233 Civil Actions or Proceedings Against Commissioned Officers or Employees
Hitt v. Frost-Arnett Company Inc
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hitt
Defendant:
Frost-Arnett Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chen v. Burttram & Henderson
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Chao Chen
Defendant:
Burttram & Henderson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Investar Bank National Association v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Investar Bank National Association
Defendant:
Shad Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
