US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 66
GATEWOOD v. UNLIMITED PATH INC
as 5:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE K GATEWOOD
Defendant:
UNLIMITED PATH INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOPCSAK v. REGISTER, et al.
as 3:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J KOPCSACK
Defendant:
ROGER DALE REGISTER, DEBORAH C REGISTER and ADVANCED REALTY CONCEPTS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BARFIELD et al v. VALUE PLACE TALLAHASSEE FL EAST LLC
as 4:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
BARRY BARFIELD , LARRY MUSSLEWHITE and EUGENE MUSSLEWHITE
Defendant:
VALUE PLACE TALLAHASSEE FL EAST LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DENTON COVE LTD et al v. CITY OF APALACHICOLA FLORIDA
as 4:2015cv00413
Plaintiff:
DENTON COVE LTD , DENTON COVE DEVELOPER INC , WENDOVER MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Defendant:
CITY OF APALACHICOLA FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HENKEL et al v. HARBOUR POINTE OF PERDIDO KEY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC
as 3:2015cv00357
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENKEL , JIM HENKEL and SARAH HENKEL
Defendant:
HARBOUR POINTE OF PERDIDO KEY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HILL v. IMPRO SYNERGIES LLC
as 1:2015cv00101
Defendant:
IMPRO SYNERGIES LLC
Plaintiff:
THURMAN HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JUDY v. GAINESVILLE CAPITAL LLC
as 1:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JOEL JUDY
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE CAPITAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HALL v. ALACHUA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
as 1:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE HALL
Defendant:
ALACHUA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIM et al v. DESTINY BY THE SEA OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
as 3:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
S BRIAN KIM and HYEWON KIM
Defendant:
DESTINY BY THE SEA OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JUDY v. STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF FLORIDA BOARD OF GOVERNORS et al
as 1:2013cv00241
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JOEL JUDY
Defendant:
BERNARD MACHEN and THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
