US District Court for the Southern District of Florida Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 550
Cash v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv24588
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Cash
Defendant:
Fabyiah Barnett and Octavia Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Caviar Entertainment Worldwide LLC et al
as 9:2023cv81493
Plaintiff:
Diana Johnson
Defendant:
Caviar Entertainment Worldwide LLC, Loreli Alanis, Annapurna Pictures LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nahas v. Coffey
as 0:2023cv62169
Plaintiff:
Karam Nahas
Defendant:
Bradley Jason Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ayre v. Does 1-9
as 1:2023cv24340
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ayre
Defendant:
Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Ayre v. Does 1-9
as 1:2023cv24339
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ayre
Defendant:
Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
SINAI HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
as 0:2023cv62159
Plaintiff:
SINAI HOLDINGS, LLC and Jacob Gitman
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ayre v. Does 1-9
as 1:2023cv24341
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ayre
Defendant:
Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Sabag v. Just Vision, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv24324
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sabag
Defendant:
Just Vision, Inc., Naked Edge Films Ltd., Ro Co Films International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Takefman v. The Pickleball Club LLC et al
as 1:2023cv24252
Plaintiff:
Earl Takefman
Defendant:
The Pickleball Club LLC and Matthew Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
CHAVEZ-ARRIETA v. DOE
as 0:2023cv61898
Plaintiff:
OSCAR CHAVEZ-ARRIETA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Michael P. and Mike Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
