D.C. Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 35,092
DIEGELMANN et al v. YELLIN et al
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
AXEL DIEGELMANN, FRITZ DIEGELMANN, RHEINGOLD EDELMETALL AG and others
Defendant:
JANET YELLIN, BRADLEY SMITH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC v. FERC
as 24-1084
Petitioner:
Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
HOLLAND LAW FIRM v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
HOLLAND LAW FIRM
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ONYEWUCHI v. EEOC OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS
as 1:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
MORRIS ONYEWUCHI
Defendant:
EEOC OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
TOBIAS v. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
JIMMY TOBIAS
Defendant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and LINA M. KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
