US District Court for the District of Columbia Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 67
NEWMAN v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2008cv01967
Plaintiff:
SEAN NEWMAN
Defendant:
FRANCISCO H. GONZALEZ and FELINA G. GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EUROPLASMA S.A. v. SOLENA GROUP, INC.
as 1:2008cv01089
Plaintiff:
EUROPLASMA S.A.
Defendant:
SOLENA GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WEBSTER BANK, N.A. v. SIPES
as 1:2008cv00815
Plaintiff:
WEBSTER BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
JON SIPES
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BENNETT v. BENNETT
as 1:2007cv02251
Plaintiff:
LUANN L. BENNETT
Defendant:
ROBERT S. BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
MERRILL LYNCH BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv02100
Plaintiff:
MERRILL LYNCH BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC. and GERALD M. SHEALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BLAIR v. ZIEGLER et al
as 1:2007cv01253
Plaintiff:
WALTER BLAIR
Defendant:
WILLIAM ZIEGLER and BB&T BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
JONES et al v. BLUE EAGLE INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2007cv01087
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE JONES and CAROLYN M. MARTIN
Defendant:
BLUE EAGLE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CRAIGDARLOCH HOLDING INC. v. BLUE EAGLE INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2007cv01086
Plaintiff:
CRAIGDARLOCH HOLDING INC.
Defendant:
BLUE EAGLE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
INEX-INTEREXPORT BELGRADE et al v. REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
as 1:2007cv00638
Plaintiff:
INEX-INTEREXPORT BELGRADE, INEX-INTEREXPORT BELGRADE, INEX-INTEREXPORT BELGRADE and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA and BANCO CENTRAL DE NICARAGUA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
ADAMS NATIONAL BANK v. SHAHPARAST
as 1:2006cv02145
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
