District of District of Columbia Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 31,451
SHEPHERD v. SHULTZ
as 1:2017cv00296
Petitioner: ERRON OMAR SHEPHERD
Respondent: L. SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00299
Plaintiff: LISA THOMPSON
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
DEAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00298
Plaintiff: MELISSA DEAN
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
UMWA 1992 BENEFIT PLAN et al v. ARCH COAL, INC.
as 1:2017cv00300
Plaintiff: UMWA 1992 BENEFIT PLAN , MICHAEL H. HOLLAND , MICHAEL O. MCKOWN and others
Defendant: ARCH COAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
PAYNE v. THE BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2017cv00297
Defendant: THE BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
Plaintiff: SHELAGH PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
AUSTIN SURGICAL HOSPITAL v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv00293
Plaintiff: AUSTIN SURGICAL HOSPITAL
Defendant: THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ORLOFSKE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00295
Plaintiff: JAMES E ORLOFSKE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Tort Claims Act
EMERGING ASIA PTE, LTD et al v. TINTCHEV et al
as 1:2017cv00287
Plaintiff: EMERGING ASIA PTE, LTD , ADIL HUSAIN
Defendant: VLADIMIR TINTCHEV, EDWARD HAHN ERNST
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
as 1:2017cv00286
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
MITCHELL v. HUGLER
as 1:2017cv00292
Petitioner: TAMMY MITCHELL
Defendant: EDWARD HUGLER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?