US District Court for the District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 48,076
Alabassi v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2021cv02852
Plaintiff:
Zeina Alabassi
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2021cv02849
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
AFFORDABLE HOUSING SPECIALIST, LLC et al v. J&L CATTLE COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02854
Plaintiff:
AFFORDABLE HOUSING SPECIALIST, LLC, HONEST VALUE LENDING, LLC and CAPITAL FOUNDRY FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
J&L CATTLE COMPANY, LLC and STEPHEN A. FRAUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
TOBIAS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv02850
Plaintiff:
JIMMY TOBIAS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
RANDOLPH v. USA
as 1:2021cv02855
Petitioner:
RONALD RANDOLPH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FARRELL v. ANACOSTIA SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv02853
Plaintiff:
LEON RUSSELL FARRELL, JR.
Defendant:
ANACOSTIA SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
