District of District of Columbia Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 31,484
WILSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00308
Plaintiff: TERESA WILSON , KYLE COOPER
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
SPOTTS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2017cv00305
Plaintiff: KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS
Defendant: LORETTA LYNCH, OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00306
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
ORLOFSKE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00295
Plaintiff: JAMES E ORLOFSKE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Tort Claims Act
DEAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00298
Plaintiff: MELISSA DEAN
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
PAYNE v. BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2017cv00297
Defendant: BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, DC
Plaintiff: SHELAGH PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
THOMPSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv00299
Plaintiff: LISA THOMPSON
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
AUSTIN SURGICAL HOSPITAL v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv00293
Plaintiff: AUSTIN SURGICAL HOSPITAL
Defendant: THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
SHEPHERD v. SHULTZ
as 1:2017cv00296
Petitioner: ERRON OMAR SHEPHERD
Respondent: L. SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
UMWA 1992 BENEFIT PLAN et al v. ARCH COAL, INC.
as 1:2017cv00300
Plaintiff: UMWA 1992 BENEFIT PLAN , MICHAEL H. HOLLAND , MICHAEL O. MCKOWN and others
Defendant: ARCH COAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?