US District Court for the District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,754
HERNANDEZ v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
JORGE E. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. MIYARES et al
as 1:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
MARK LOWE
Defendant:
JASON MIYARES, CRAIG STALLARD, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATTLETON v. PETERS
as 1:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
COLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COX v. FOSTER
as 1:2023cv00757
Petitioner:
CARLOS D. COX, JR.
Respondent:
COREY FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GRISSOM v. DEHAAN
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE GRISSOM
Defendant:
SUE DEHAAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Not Classified By Court:
COLETTE S. PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
PHILIPPEAUX v. GARLAND
as 1:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
PHILANDER PHILIPPEAUX
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS SR. v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
STEVEN JERMAINE HARRIS SR.
Respondent:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAHLMAN v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID STAHLMAN
Defendant:
KATHY P. LANE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
