District of District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 41 - 50 of 5,447
REYNOLDS v. THIRD CIRCUIT SOLICITORS OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv02056
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL L. REYNOLDS
Defendant: THIRD CIRCUIT SOLICITORS OFFICE, ERNEST A. FINNEY, III, TYLER B. BROWN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2017cv01944
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JORDAN
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv01916
Petitioner: JAMES D. MATTHEWS
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MALLETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01887
Petitioner: DAWANE ARTHUR MALLETT
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLERVRAIN v. SESSIONS
as 1:2017cv01858
Plaintiff: MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant: JEFF SESSIONS
Cause Of Action: Equal Access to Justice
EL AMIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01888
Petitioner: SALEEM EL AMIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHEPHARD v. MASIC et al
as 1:2017cv01843
Plaintiff: ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant: JOHN MASIC, WISEMAN, DUNCON and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIMES v. VANTELAS et al
as 1:2017cv01798
Plaintiff: JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant: VANTELAS, RAHEJA, AIMEE FRANKENBERGER
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIMES v. GRIMES-STARNES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01797
Plaintiff: JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant: DIANA GRIMES-STARNES, STERLING, DIANA GRIMES
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv01781
Plaintiff: JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant: BUREAU OF PRISONS , ASHLEY CHRISTENSEN
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?