District of District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 5,367
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv01552
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. TILLBROOK et al
as 1:2017cv01562
Plaintiff: THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant: CHAD E. TILLBROOK, DAVIS & DAVIS LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
ABU MEZER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01551
Petitioner: GAZI IBRAHIM ABU MEZER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COTNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01467
Petitioner: ROBERT COTNER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EDMONSON v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2017cv01414
Plaintiff: KENNY EDMONSON
Defendant: GLORIA STEVENS, RANDY JOHNSON, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
STANTON v. YOUNT et al
as 1:2017cv01480
Plaintiff: FREEMAN WILLIAM STANTON
Defendant: JOSEPH D. YOUNT, WILLIAM L. TROY, LORNA B. ESTEP and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DAY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2017cv01418
Plaintiff: ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
SPAULDING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01419
Plaintiff: LEVON SPAULDING
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIMES v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01387
Plaintiff: JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, SPRINGFIELD HOSPITAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIMES v. CLEARLY-TROMBLY et al
as 1:2017cv01378
Plaintiff: JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant: AMI CLEARLY-TROMBLY, PIK CHOI, CHAN and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?