US District Court for the District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,795
SMITH v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ABRAHAM SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, MIKE PENSE and SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREESON v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
REMBERT D. GREESON
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHANSLEY v. USA
as 1:2023cv01179
Petitioner:
JACOB ANTHONY CHANSLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
C. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
V. C., B. L. and L. S.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIELDS v. USA
as 1:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
ANTHONY FIELDS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BERRY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURKE BERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICOLESCU v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
BOGDAN NICOLESCU
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, M. D. CARAVAJAL, DAVID BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01141
Petitioner:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YUAN v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
JIANBIN YUAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
