CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
| RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN |
| JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR., ROBERT F. KRAPENC, CORY D. HELFFRICH and ADAM FEDERER |
| 1:2024cv00559 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: General (Habeas Corpus) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case transferred to the USDC for the Southern District of Ohio pursuant to #4 Order Transferring Pro Se Case; Sent to Court via extraction. (znmw) |
| Receipt on 4/8/2024 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 2:24-cv-01609 sent by USDC for the Southern District of Ohio. (znmw) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Southern District of Ohio. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 3/30/2024. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 03/10/2024. (zsl)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN. (zjd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN. (zjd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (zjd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 2/26/2024. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zjd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
