US District Court for the District of Columbia Real Property Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 176,071 RENTABLE SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND RELATED SPACE et al
as 1:2013cv00886
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
176,071 RENTABLE SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE AND RELATED SPACE, 1441 L ASSOCIATES, LLC, NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NORTHROP ET AL
as 1:2013cv00316
Defendant:
MARY C. NORTHROP, CLYDE W. NORTHROP, ESTATE OF HOWARD A. GRAYSON, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. ALL OF PARCEL OF LAND IDENTIFIED IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AS 2626 NAYLOR ROAD, S.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20020 SQUARE/LOT 5633/0801 et al
as 1:2010cv01986
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
ALL OF PARCEL OF LAND IDENTIFIED IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AS 2626 NAYLOR ROAD, S.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20020 SQUARE/LOT 5633/0801 , AUTOZONE STORES, INC. and AUTOZONE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MILLER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2006cv01935
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. TELES AG INFORMATIONSTECHNOLOGIEN
as 1:2005cv02048
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
NATIONAL CAPITAL REVITALIZATION CORPORATION et al v. FRANCO et al
as 1:2005cv01603
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
FRANCO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2005cv01058
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
AUTOZONE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2005cv00476
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. 109,204.5 SQUARE FEET OF LAND et al
as 1:2005cv00202
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
