US District Court for the District of Columbia Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 63
U.S. AIRWAYS MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INT'L et al v. AMERICA WEST MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INT'L et al
as 1:2007cv01309
Plaintiff:
U.S. AIRWAYS MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INT'L and JOHN A. STEPHAN
Defendant:
AMERICA WEST MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INT'L, AMERICA WEST MASTER EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INT'L and JOHN MCILVENNA
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION, IBT v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD et al
as 1:2006cv01532
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION, IBT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CORP.
as 1:2006cv00754
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES, DIVISION, IBT v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2006cv00631
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN
as 1:2006cv00506
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2006cv00503
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES, DIVISION, IBT v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD et al
as 1:2005cv02194
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
IBT/HERE EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVES' COUNCIL v. GATE GOURMET DIVISION AMERICAS
as 1:2005cv01210
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 184 Action to Set Aside Award of a System Board
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. et al
as 1:2005cv01188
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
NATIONAL RAILWAY LABOR CONFERENCE et al v. BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
as 1:2004cv01860
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
