US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Cases 81 - 90 of 146,308
Hullihen et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03368
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hullihen and Cynthia Hullihen
Defendant:
Exactech Inc and Exactech US Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Piekarski et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03375
Plaintiff:
Judith A Piekarski and Ronald Piekarski
Defendant:
Exactech Inc and Exactech US Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sulka et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03376
Plaintiff:
John Sulka and Marilyn Sulka
Defendant:
Exactech Inc and Exactech US Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCall v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
Kerry McCall
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
