US District Court for the Southern District of New York Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 22,411
Garcia v. Ray's Smoothies Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02234
Plaintiff:
Maria Garcia
Defendant:
Rays Smoothies Inc., Antonio Herreros and Ana Vergel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez v. Taqueria Emilio 3 Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Yahir Gonzalez
Defendant:
Taqueria Emilio 3 Corp. and Elvin Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Oropeza v. Made In Mexico Uptown Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02236
Plaintiff:
Salomon Oropeza
Defendant:
Made In Mexico Uptown Corp. and Ismael Bourdier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Trustees of the Local 806 Structural Steel and Bridge Painters of Greater New York Employee Trust Funds et al v. Iron Bridge Constructors, Inc.
as 7:2024cv02206
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Local 806 Structural Steel and Bridge Painters of Greater New York Employee Trust Funds, Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Trust Funds, Trustees of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades National Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Iron Bridge Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Guzman v. D & C Loop Inc et al
as 1:2024cv02235
Plaintiff:
Joel Guzman
Defendant:
D & C Loop Inc and Teng Huang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Local 1783 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Pension and Insurance Fund v. JT Roselle Lighting and Supply Company, Inc.,
as 7:2024cv02174
Plaintiff:
Local 1783 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Pension and Insurance Fund
Defendant:
JT Roselle Lighting and Supply Company, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions
Peters v. Harlem Restoration Project, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02196
Plaintiff:
Calbert Peters
Defendant:
Harlem Restoration Project, Inc. and Ricky Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nash v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Frank Nash
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Oxford Health Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Arapos v. Bank of Nova Scotia et al
as 1:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Irene Arapos
Defendant:
Bank of Nova Scotia, John Doe 1-5 and Doe Corporations 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm Fed. Question: Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
