US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 51 - 60 of 220,072
Flagg v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03374
Plaintiff:
Damon Mickeal Flagg
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Tenempaguay v. Cajigas et al
as 1:2024cv03395
Plaintiff:
Angel David Moncayo Tenempaguay
Defendant:
Michael Anthony Cajigas, Sauder Transport Company and R.W. Sauder, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Dongguan Cheng One Co., Ltd. v. Desen Inc.
as 7:2024cv03388
Plaintiff:
Dongguan Cheng One Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Desen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jones v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2024cv03417
Plaintiff:
Janajah Monae Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hillary
as 1:2024cv03397
Petitioner:
Errol Hillary
Other:
Marylyn Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Inostroza v. Tienken et al
as 1:2024cv03400
Plaintiff:
Romina Morales Inostroza
Defendant:
Jean Tienken and Comic Strip Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
20230930-DK-Butterfly-1, Inc. v. HBC Investments LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03370
Plaintiff:
20230930-DK-Butterfly-1, Inc. and Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
Defendant:
HBC Investments LLC and Hudson Bay Capital Management LP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
