U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 810
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Eileen Raposa, et al v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc
as 24-1705
Plaintiff:
EILEEN RAPOSA, MICHAEL L. RAFFO, VALERIE LANE and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA INC
In re: Ex Parte Application of SPS I Fundo De
as 24-1693
Plaintiff:
SPS I FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO DE ACOES, Investimento no Exterior
Defendant:
COLORADO INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC, DBA Blessed Holdings LLC
Jeffrey Chijioke-Uche v. Chapman Chevrolet LLC, et al
as 24-1691
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
CHAPMAN CHEVROLET LLC and GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Jeffrey Chijioke-Uche v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al
as 24-1690
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC, TRANSUNION LLC and others
Nicholas Martino v. USA
as 24-1694
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS K. MARTINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Application of Rosa Carolina Germano Dos
as 24-1640
Petitioner:
ROSA CAROLINA GERMANO DOS SANTOS
Respondent:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC and BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC
James Kirkham, et al v. Taxact Inc
as 24-1515
Plaintiff:
JAMES KIRKHAM, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and MATTHEW SESSOMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
TAXACT INC
Ricardo Devengoechea v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DEVENGOECHEA
Defendant:
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, a foreign state
John Kodenkandeth v. UPMC Health Plan Inc, et al
as 24-1208
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KODENKANDETH
Defendant:
UPMC HEALTH PLAN INC, DBA UPMC for Life, UPM CORPORATE HOLDING CO, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS SERVICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
