Third Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 849
Reynolds v. Spruill et al
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
Jon Reynolds
Defendant:
Yancey Spruill, Warren Adelman, Amy Butte and others
Nominal Defendant:
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
MOORE v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2023cv23071
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY MOORE
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Maharaj v. Stairs et al
as 1:2023cv01410
Plaintiff:
Dr. Damien D. Maharaj
Defendant:
Janice Stairs, Karl Hanneman, David Peat and others
Nominal Defendant:
Gatos Silver, Inc.
Bowling v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Maren K. Bowling
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Michael Bernstein, Maren K. Bowling and Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
Niquette v. Harris et al
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Niquette
Defendant:
Taylor C. Harris, Janet D. Widmann, Juliane T. Park and others
Nominal Defendant:
Cutera, Inc.
Abu Ghazaleh v. Schadt et al
as 1:2023cv01357
Nominal Defendant:
GeneDx Holdings Corp. and Sema
Plaintiff:
Patricia E. Abu Ghazaleh
Defendant:
Eric Schadt, Katherine Stueland, Isaac Ro and others
Bhavsar et al v. Fruchterman et al
as 1:2023cv01356
Nominal Defendant:
Butterfly Network, Inc. and Longview Acquisition Corporation I
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Todd M. Fruchterman, Stephanie Fielding, Jonathan M. Rothberg and others
HEICKLEN v. HOLLERAN et al
as 2:2023cv22649
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HEICKLEN
Defendant:
Kevin Holleran, STEPHEN J. FELICE, CHRISTOPHER F. BERTRAND and others
Shah v. Narayen et al
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse, Brett Biggs and others
Nominal Defendant:
Adobe Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
