US District Court for the District of Delaware Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 11,982
Shoulder Innovations, Inc. v. Catalyst Orthoscience Inc.
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Shoulder Innovations, Inc.
Defendant:
Catalyst Orthoscience Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dynamite Marketing, Inc. v. HIT Promotional Products, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Dynamite Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
HIT Promotional Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Keysoft, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Keysoft, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Keysoft, Inc. v. Salesforce, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Keysoft, Inc.
Defendant:
Salesforce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TG--2006 Holdings, LLC v. Acronis SCS, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
TG--2006 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Acronis SCS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. et al v. Singer Vehicle Design
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. and Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
Defendant:
Singer Vehicle Design and Singer Vehicle Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Payvox LLC v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Payvox LLC
Defendant:
Visa U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cerebrum Sensor Technologies, Inc. et al v. Revvo Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Cerebrum Sensor Technologies, Inc. and Tire Stickers LLC
Defendant:
Revvo Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
American Regent, Inc. v. Somerset Therapeutics, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
American Regent, Inc.
Defendant:
Somerset Therapeutics, LLC, Somerset Pharma, LLC and Odin Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd. et al v. KyLin TV, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. and Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
KyLin TV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
