New Jersey Contract Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 212
FR8 Zone, Inc. v. All Jays Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05560
Defendant:
Cappy's Brothers Transport, JOSEPH CAPRIGLIONE, All Jays Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
FR8 Zone, Inc. and FR8 ZONE, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
YUE v. LOR
as 2:2020cv05099
Defendant:
STEWART LOR
Plaintiff:
XIN YUE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
TRACEY v. RECOVCO MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv03298
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE T TRACEY and CONSTANCE T. TRACEY
Defendant:
Hugh Goldson, RECOVCO MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, LLC and RECOVCO MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT, LLC doing business as SPROUT MORTGAGE
ALLIED VISION GROUP, INC. v. LEFKOWITZ et al
as 2:2020cv02367
Defendant:
ENVISION EYE CARE, INC., PROVISION SUPPLY, LLC, ENVISION OPTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALLIED VISION GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
TIGER SUPPLIES INC. v. ALLPAC WORLDWIDE, INC.
as 2:2020cv01864
Defendant:
ALLPAC WORLDWIDE, INC.
Plaintiff:
TIGER SUPPLIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RADIUS BANK v. REVILLA & COMPANY, CPA'S, PC
as 3:2020cv01370
Defendant:
REVILLA & COMPANY, CPA'S, PC
Plaintiff:
RADIUS BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ECAPITAL CORP. v. VISION EXPRESS / WRAG-TIME TRANSPORATION
as 1:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
eCapital LLC and ECAPITAL CORP.
Defendant:
VISION EXPRESS / WRAG-TIME TRANSPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVIS
as 3:2019cv21463
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MST ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC
as 2:2019cv20853
Defendant:
MST Acquisition Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EXPRESS CONSTRUCTION 3 CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv20743
Defendant:
EXPRESS CONSTRUCTION 3 CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
