US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 168
Charbonnet v. Malveaux
as 3:2015cv00799
Plaintiff:
Paul Charbonnet
Defendant:
Chester Charles Malveaux
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Southeast Engineers, LLC and John Craig Duos v. The Brewer Construction Group, LLC
as 3:2015cv00760
Plaintiff:
John Craig Duos and Southeast Engineers, LLC
Defendant:
James Brewer and The Brewer Construction Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Benny's Carwash, LLC
as 3:2015cv00684
Defendant:
Benny's Carwash, LLC
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Mapp v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
Desmond Mapp
Defendant:
UMG Recordings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Antoine v. Boutte
as 3:2015cv00570
Plaintiff:
Thomas Antoine
Defendant:
Norris Boutte
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Antoine v. Boutte
as 3:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Thomas Antoine
Defendant:
Norris Boutte
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Antoine v. Boutte
as 3:2015cv00561
Plaintiff:
Thomas Antoine
Defendant:
Norris Boutte
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Investar Holding Corporation et al v. Investar Redevelopment, L.L.C.
as 3:2015cv00481
Plaintiff:
Investar Bank and Investar Holding Corporation
Defendant:
Investar Redevelopment, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HAMDAN et al
as 3:2015cv00411
Plaintiff:
IMAD FAIEZ HAMDAN and TIGER BROTHERS FOOD MART INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Hamdan v. Tiger Brothers Food Mart Inc.
as 3:2015cv00412
Plaintiff:
Imad Faiez Hamdan
Defendant:
Tiger Brothers Food Mart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
