US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Rexel Inc v. Old Republic Insurance Co
as 5:2014cv02845
Plaintiff:
Rexel Inc
Defendant:
Old Republic Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Rexel, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02845
Plaintiff:
Rexel, Inc.
Defendant:
Old Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
C B C of Charleston Inc et al v. Q B S Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02788
Plaintiff:
C B C of Charleston Inc and USA
Defendant:
Q B S Inc and Federal Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
E H Development Inc v. Asset Group Inc et al
as 1:2014cv02353
Plaintiff:
E H Development Inc
Defendant:
Asset Group Inc and Great American Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Rexel Inc v. Twin City Electric L L C et al
as 2:2014cv01006
Plaintiff:
Rexel Inc
Defendant:
Twin City Electric L L C, Jamco Ventures L L C and Travelers Casualty & Surety Co of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Rexel Inc v. Twin City Electric L L C et al
as 5:2014cv01006
Plaintiff:
Rexel Inc
Defendant:
Twin City Electric L L C, Jamco Ventures L L C and Travelers Casualty & Surety Co of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Rexel Inc v. Twin City Electric L L C et al
as 2:2014cv01010
Plaintiff:
Rexel Inc
Defendant:
Twin City Electric L L C, Walsh Ross Group Joint Venture, Travelers Casualty & Surety Co of America and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Jack Moorman Electrical Contractors Inc v. Affiliated Western Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Jack Moorman Electrical Contractors Inc
Defendant:
Affiliated Western Inc and Old Republic Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Capital Contracting Co v. Fessler & Bowman Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00796
Plaintiff:
Capital Contracting Co
Defendant:
Fessler & Bowman Inc, Pacific Tech Construction Inc, Sauer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
