Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Hathorne v. Levi Strauss & Co. et al
as 3:2008cv00368
Plaintiff:
Robert Hathorne and Robert Hathorne
Defendant:
Levi Strauss & Co., UNITE HERE!, UNITE HERE! and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King Industries, Inc. v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada et al
as 3:2007cv00671
Plaintiff:
King Industries, Inc., King Industries, Inc. and King Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union 714 and Steve Pike
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Artz et al v. Mississippi River Boat Council et al
as 1:2007cv01006
Plaintiff:
Billie Jo Artz, Daniel Kudrav and Inetra Wright
Defendant:
Mississippi River Boat Council, Unite Here, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Tucker v. Friends of Children of Mississippi et al
as 3:2006cv00418
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Omnova Solutions, Inc. v. Local Union No.748-L of the United Steel Workers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC
as 1:2005cv00155
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Barber et al
as 3:2005cv00248
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Coley v. Universal Lighting and Technologies et al
as 3:2005cv00225
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 480 et al v. Raceway Electric, Inc. et al
as 3:2005cv00217
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
International Bro., et al v. Nelson, et al
as 3:2004cv00319
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
