US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Countrymark Cooperative, LLP v. Jolly et al
as 4:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Countrymark Cooperative, LLP
Defendant:
Peter E. Jolly , Alladin Oil Corporation , Energy Capital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States Postal Service v. Medical World Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00637
Plaintiff:
United States Postal Service
Defendant:
Medical World Communications, Inc., BNP Media II, LLC, Ascend Media Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States Postal Service v. Medical World Communications, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00637
Plaintiff:
United States Postal Service
Defendant:
Medical World Communications, Inc., BNP Media II, LLC, Ascend Media Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
A.W.R.Y. Enterprises, Inc. v. JSB Enterprizes, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00542
Plaintiff:
A.W.R.Y. Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
JSB Enterprizes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Destin Drywall & Paint, Inc. v. S.C. Nestel, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00061
Defendant:
S.C. Nestel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Destin Drywall & Paint, Inc. and Destin Drywall & Paint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Spencer
as 3:2007cv00664
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Deloris A. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United States of America v. Lett
as 3:2007cv00596
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John S. Lett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Erroneous Refund
McKim v. New Market Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00337
Plaintiff:
Michael H. McKim
Defendant:
New Market Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
G. D. Deal Holdings, LLC et al v. Baker Energy, Inc.
as 1:2005cv00003
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.