Kentucky Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 138
Brentwood Industries, Inc. v. Stinger Equipment, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brentwood Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Stinger Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Blazer v. Chrisman Mill Farms LLC
as 5:2017cv00430
Plaintiff:
Brian Robert Blazer
Defendant:
Chrisman Mill Farms, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Chrisman Mill Farms, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Brian Robert Blazer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chrisman Mill Farms, LLC v. Blazer
as 5:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Chrisman Mill Farms, LLC
Defendant:
Brian R. Blazer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Reyn Pharma, LLC v. Innovative Nutrition et al
as 5:2016cv00476
Plaintiff:
Reyn Pharma, LLC
Defendant:
Innovative Nutrition and Steuben Park Research Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Louisville Arena Authority, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Louisville Arena Authority, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky
as 2:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
CandyRific, LLC v. Frankford Candy & Chocolate Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00418
Defendant:
Frankford Candy & Chocolate Co., Inc, Frankford Candy & Chocolate Co., Inc. and Frankford Candy LLC
Plaintiff:
CandyRific, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Afshari v. Montana Black Gold, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ben Afshari
Defendant:
Montana Black Gold, Inc. and Sight Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Afshari v. Bear Archery Inc.
as 5:2015cv00330
Plaintiff:
Ben Afshari
Defendant:
Bear Archery Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Smith v. Weinstein, et al
as 3:2015cv00816
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Smith
Defendant:
V-F Controls, Jim Weinstein and Charles A. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
