US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,888
Al Momani v. Monti et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Petitioner:
Baha'Eddin Al Momani
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Hinthorne
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin
Respondent:
Cherryl Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Brookhart
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Markeas D. Brown
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois and Dr. Deanna Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2023cv17004
Petitioner:
Charles Fleming
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shields v. Wills et al
as 1:2023cv16959
Petitioner:
Curtis Shields
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoskins v. Lammer
as 3:2023cv50443
Petitioner:
Walter Hoskins
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Verser v. Osborne et al
as 1:2023cv16784
Petitioner:
Hulon Verser
Respondent:
Kenneth Osborne and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Tack
as 1:2023cv16803
Plaintiff:
Raymond Brown
Defendant:
Worden Tack and Andrea Tack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2023cv16708
Petitioner:
Deshanta Young
Respondent:
Dee-Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odom v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2023cv16695
Petitioner:
David Odom
Respondent:
Raul Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
