US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 193
USA v. $32,920.00 in United States currency
as 3:2017cv00380
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$32,920.00 in United States currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $115,020.00 in United States currency
as 3:2017cv00307
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$115,020.00 in United States currency
Claimant:
Semin Muranovic and Mersada Muranovic
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Assorted Jewelry
as 3:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Assorted Jewelry
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $853,210.11 in United States Currency
as 3:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$853,210.11 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. $60,000.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$60,000.00 in United States Currency and $2,075.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $38,000 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2016cv01177
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$38,000 in United States Currency and Buick Enclave, One 2008, VIN: 5GAER237X8J253639
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Miscellaneous Firearms and Ammunition
as 3:2016cv01060
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Miscellaneous Firearms and Ammunition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
USA v. $39,100.00 in United States currency
as 3:2016cv00618
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$39,100.00 in United States currency
Claimant:
Jose Luis Magallon and Magallon Enterprises, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. 5,255 British Pounds of Currency et al
as 3:2016cv00505
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
5,255 British Pounds of Currency and Miscellaneous Computer and Electronic Equipment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. $8,600.00 in United States currency et al
as 3:2016cv00433
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$8,600.00 in United States currency, $4,283.00 in United States currency and Assorted Jewelry
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
